|
I hope you listeners don't mind now if I go solo, so to
speak, and take some time to discuss an issue I have dealt with in the
past. That issue is the harm many so-called ex-gay ministries do to the
cause of Christ. Now, I bring up the issue here for a reason, and we'll
get to that in a minute, but many evangelicals have it in their head that
the secret weapon against Sodom is ministries led by former citizens of
Sodom.
But God is our shield
and our bulwark, our strong tower, and our defender. God's Word is the
only perfect and reliable weapon we have in our contest with New Sodom.
Now, any ministry work which consistently and persistently
speaks against the Word of God—and anyone leading such a ministry that
does such a thing—is no friend of righteousness—I would dare to say,
is no friend of God. It has been my observation that former
homosexuals—I'm speaking in general here, and quite frankly, maybe not
so general even—these people do not make good point men for the Lord's
people when it comes to defending the Word of God against the lies of
Sodom. That's the track record we see. I'm just telling you what I've
seen.
It is one thing for a former sodomite, saved by grace through
faith in Jesus Christ, to go out and witness to sodomites. We had a
wonderful testimony of that last week. We heard of such a man preaching
the Word of God, including the Lord's law, at a sodomite carnival. But it
seems these big-name former sodomites who head up the so-called ex-gay
ministries always—it's been my experience, my observation—always seem
to neglect the law of God and always make it sound like we Christians are
supposed to spend all of our time ministering to sodomites and sharing the
gospel—not even sharing the gospel, just being friends with
sodomites—and none of our time declaring what the Word of God has to say
about the abomination of sodomy. And we're not to spend any of our time,
apparently, defending the Word of God against the perversions that are
being foisted on an ignorant nation by the theologians of New Sodom.
Now, the sins of a man's past can still affect his outlook on
things after he is saved by the Lord. Homosexuality is a very selfish,
self-centered, narcissistic way of life. And I believe many of the
high-profile, ex-gay, evangelical ministry leaders may indeed be
influenced by their past in the way they deal with the issue of
homosexuality; and thus they have a corrupting influence, doctrinally
speaking, on the Lord's people. These people need discipleship; they don't
need to go out and disciple others, at least with regard to homosexuality,
it seems to me. Now, I am not talking about just legitimate differences of
opinion here. I am talking about grievous doctrinal error which does
great, great damage. You see, there's this psychological approach to
combating this evil of homosexuality. They have people like Dr. James
Dobson who puts together these ex-gay conferences—we'll just use the
word they use, ex-gay—and
indulges in all sorts of psychological schemes and language and devices to
supposedly win people out of homosexuality and to Christ.
Well, I want to give you an example of the very thing I'm
talking about—when I talk about how these ex-gay ministries, ex-gay
people can spread a grievous doctrinal error.
Mike Haley, a former sodomite, is the manager—this is his
title; I didn't give it to him—the manager of the Homosexuality and
Gender Issues Department at the very ecumenical Focus on the Family; and
he also serves as chairman of the board of Exodus International—North
America.
Now Mr. Haley has a new book titled 101 Frequently Asked Questions about Homosexuality. And of course,
there are some good things in this book, but it is also a very good
example of what I have been talking about with regard to the ex-gay
ministry world. I am going to read you some excerpts from Mike Haley's
book which I found by skimming through it. I didn't read the whole thing;
I skimmed through it, sort of did a little speed-reading. I've heard that
it has already been acclaimed by some high-profile evangelical celebrities
on Christian radio. Now if Mr. Haley was simply weak in a few areas or had
not done a good job of explaining himself or just made some honest
mistakes, or I just had some differences of opinions with him on some
legitimately disputable issues, that would be one thing. I mean, we must
not bite and devour each other.
But what you will hear is grievous, systematic, persistent
error which does violence to the Word of God, and it is my experience and
my observation that this is the sort of error which is very common in the
neo-evangelical world and certainly is being perpetuated by the Mike Haley
types; by the James Dobson types; by the former homosexual, the ex-gay
ministries, unfortunately—perhaps not all of them, but the ones I've
come across.
Now my plan is to bring these things to the Body of Christ
using as brief a time as I can. I trust you will compare Haley's
statements with the Word of God, but let's get started. This is from Mike
Haley's book 101 Frequently Asked
Questions about Homosexuality. Here's a question; listen carefully:
"Do homosexuals choose to be gay?" That's the question given in
the book. Mr. Haley writes this: "Let me answer this one directly: No! And in case you didn't hear me, let me speak up:" —he
puts in all caps—"NO! This continues to be one of the myths of
homosexuality that uninformed people perpetuate. . . . I can tell you from
personal experience that virtually no
one chooses homosexuality and the resulting pain and rejection that
comes with it."
Now that's what Mr. Haley says; but of course, that statement
is right out of the sodomite playbook, and it is echoed by the Catholic
Catechism! That's right. And as far as the pain and rejection
bit—you know, that being the so-called proof sodomites don't choose to
be the way they are, they're just born that way—sodomites use that all
the time. That's nonsense. The same statement could be used about many
other sins, including adultery and murder. Who would choose to be a
murderer? Who would choose to be an adulterer? Look at the pain and
rejection that comes from those sins. Here's Mike Haley talking like a
sodomite, quite frankly.
But to say sodomites do not choose to commit sodomy is
against the Bible which makes it clear that homosexuality, like all sin,
is chosen by the sinner. He or she may not remember the mental and the
spiritual process that led to the act, and there might be a lot of reasons
for the act—even if you want to say environmental reasons that helped
propel a person toward a certain sin. There are no excuses, but there
might be some reasons; there might be all these different things that come
together; but in the end, it's our sin nature; and the Bible makes it
clear homosexuals do choose to do what they do. And of course, each time
they do it again, they choose to do it again. For instance, the Bible says
about sodomites, they "change the natural" for "that which
is against nature." They choose. That's a choice.
But let's go on to another issue—Mike Haley thinks sons
showering—taking showers—with their dads is "good for small boys
and can sometimes include brothers" [Haley quoting Dr. Joseph and
Linda Nicolosi]. I mean, that is an abominable suggestion! Such a thing
dishonors fathers. Mike Haley apparently never read the account of Noah
and his sons. The group shower Haley promotes also teaches children to be
immodest, to say the least.
Now on page fifty two of 101
Frequently Asked Questions about Homosexuality, we find this question:
"I feel the need to write my grandson, who recently announced his
homosexuality, because he doesn't call or visit. I've sent devotionals,
written out Bible passages, and tried to encourage him to change, assuring
him of my love and encouraging him to keep in contact. I pray for him
daily. Can I do anything more concrete?" How does Mr. Haley answer
this apparently godly, courageous grandparent? We need more like her. What
a blessing for the grandson! How does Haley answer? Does he commend this
person? Not hardly. Listen to his ungodly answer: "Yes, there is
something concrete you can do: Stop!
Your motives are obviously pure, but you are actually having the opposite
effect than you hoped for: You are driving your grandson further away from
you, and from the healing power of Jesus." "Driving your
grandson away" from Jesus by giving him Bible passages? By giving him
various Bible literature?
Haley goes on to say: "Pick up the phone, call him, and
ask for forgiveness. Assure him that your love for him will never stop but
that your ineffective ways of expressing that love to him most certainly
will. Then ask him how you might do a better job of showing your love for
him." Do you hear that? You're supposed—this person who's using the
Bible, who's reaching out with the Word of God is supposed to stop;
apologize to the sodomite; say this was ineffective, using the Bible. The
Bible is ineffective. Tell me, tell me, sodomite, how I might better show
love for you? I mean, this is outrageous.
Next we pick up on page fifty three with this question:
"How should we respond to our son who wants to bring his live-in
'significant other' to spend the weekend in our home?" This is
talking about the sodomite now. He wants to bring his sodomite male friend
home. "We've been asking them to stay in a motel, but that has just
led to our son not visiting at all." Now, of course, here Mr. Haley
should have encouraged the grieving parents to stand firm and not allow
the "significant other" into their home and thus encourage that
perverse relationship. But what does he say? Well, he perverts the Word of
God. He says this: "Consider the parable of the prodigal son (Luke
15). When the prodigal 'came to his senses,' he went home. He wouldn't
have done that unless he thought it would be safe—that someone would be
there to joyfully welcome him. Many homosexuals don't believe they have
welcoming homes to run to, and in fact, many of them don't."
What a minute! This is sophistry—a proud, open sodomite
wants to bring his sodomite partner into his parents' home, and Haley
perverts the parable of the prodigal son to say you should allow this to
happen. What sophistry to compare the homecoming of the prodigal son to an
unrepentant sodomite wanting to bring his partner home to his parents'
house! The prodigal son did not return home with the harlots with whom he
had been fornicating! He had repented and came home asking forgiveness. He
said "Father, I have sinned against heaven, and in thy sight, and am
no more worthy to be called thy son." It was then the father joyfully
received him back.
Now Mike Haley encourages the parents to allow the sodomite
son and his partner in sexual crime to stay overnight in their home,
although he says they should not sleep together. He says in another part
of the book, let them come home, but they just shouldn't sleep together in
your house. But then he suggests that while the sodomites ought to be
welcomed, those who are against them staying should not be welcome. Listen
to this; here's Haley speaking:
"If
you decide to let your son and his partner stay overnight in your home,
the family members who are uncomfortable with that decision should
seriously consider whether they want to take part in the gathering.
Conflicting messages from family members, especially family members who
profess to be Christians, can drive a wedge between you and your son at
the very time you're trying to demonstrate your love for him."
Isn't that just abominable, and doesn't Proverbs
17:15
say, "He that
justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the just, even they both are
abomination to the Lord"?
On page sixty nine of his new book, Mike Haley deals with
this question: "The lesbian couple next door has adopted a child and
invited me to attend a 'celebration of life' event at their home. What
should I do?" Well, here is Mr. Haley's unbelievable answer (I'm
giving you excerpts): "[T]hese are events that Christians should jump
at the chance to attend. Nothing could agree more with our foundational
belief in the sanctity of human life." How he comes up with that, I
do not know. I mean, as they say in the legal world, supra.
I mean, go back to Proverbs 17:15. And also we think of 1 Corinthians
15:33: "Be not deceived: evil communications corrupt good
manners." And we could quote so many Scripture verses to say how
wrong Haley is to encourage Christians to join with sodomites in
celebrating their adoption of a child.
Now throughout Mike Haley's book, it is clear over and over
that he believes one can be a sodomite and a Christian. This is especially
egregious. He gives sort of mixed signals in some places; in other places,
it's not mixed at all. For instance, it is clear in his response to this
question found on page 146: "Our pastor says that all homosexuals are
going to hell. Is that true?" Now here's Mr. Haley responding. He
comes back with a response that shows that he has no concern that he is
undermining a pastor who has taken a biblical stance badly needed in this
confused age of growing apostasy. Mr. Haley responds with this perverse
hermeneutic which just confuses many. Here's what he says. This is typical
of the ex-gay ministries, unfortunately; it's typical of the
neo-evangelical world. Here's what Haley says: "Does your pastor also
believe all alcoholics are going to hell? How about all gossips? All
liars? Salvation isn't dependent on some sort of sliding scale of whose
sins are more serious. Each of us must believe in, acknowledge, and submit
to the lordship of Jesus Christ. If brokenness is the criterion for
keeping one out of heaven, I know of no one who qualifies." What is
he talking about? Brokenness? I mean, he's not talking about repentance
here. He's talking about just someone who's deeply involved in sin, and he
calls that brokenness. He's not talking about repentance. "Man's
salvation is not dependent on our
actions but on our belief in
His." He's just perverting God's grace here.
Now listen; here's what he says: "Many people believe in
Christ—gay and straight alike—who have not yet been convicted about or
enlightened to God's full truth regarding particular moral issues,
temptations, or sins. . . . Once someone comes to know the truth and
continues to live in open rebellion, though, their love for God must be
questioned." So if a sodomite says, "I know the truth, and I'm
saved," but he continues to commit homosexuality, you don't question
his salvation, his conversion, his regeneration. You just question how
much they love God. You see what he's saying here? You see what he's doing
here?
"[T]here are
churches whose congregations are largely active gays and lesbians. An
example is the network of Metropolitan Community Churches. This can only
be because there are homosexuals
who desire to love Jesus, who have not felt welcome in the congregations
that have forgiven the sins of the drug abuser and the abortion survivor
and the repentant adulterer." Well, where do we go with this? This is
a two-hour sermon, isn't it? In the time available, what can I say? I can
only urge Mr. Haley to read I Corinthians 6:9-11 for starters and realize
he has been deceived when he makes the claim that those practicing
sodomite acts have been regenerated and adopted into the family of God.
Haley is so man-centered. He's so man-centered. Doesn't he believe that
there is such a thing as a regeneration by the Holy Ghost? Doesn't he
believe that we become new creatures in Christ? It doesn't mean we become
sinless; but the Bible is clear: we don't live openly in perverse,
abominable sins if we're saved, regenerated by the power of God, reborn.
And to answer his earlier question, those who consistently
lie—I'm saying this is their language, their native tongue—and those
who are drunks do show they have not been redeemed by the blood of the
Lamb. That's clear. Now being a child of God is not a matter of living
sinlessly; it's a matter of not living in gross, open sin though. I mean,
we don't live in gross, open sin and rebellion to God. The Word of God is
the final word on the matter. I know we're treating it a little briefly,
but we need to move on.
There are a couple of other confusing statements from Haley
that I want to deal with just very briefly. And here are a couple of
confusing statements from Haley, the first on page 71 and the second on
page 167: "When reaching out to the gay community, we must avoid
behaviors that would keep our gay friends away from the open arms of their
Savior." So apparently all the sodomites have a Savior. I mean, if
you're not saved, you don't have a Savior; and the Bible is pretty clear
that there are more that don't get saved than that do. It's a strait gate.
It's a narrow way. Jesus is the gate.
"When gays are convinced that Christians embrace
hateful, bigoted, intolerant, or homophobic thoughts, we have to
acknowledge that part of the reason may be that we don't exemplify love in
a way the gay community can receive." So here you are, folks. You're
supposed to exemplify love the way the "gay community" defines
love and will then receive it. And shame on you, Christians, if you have
what Mike Haley calls a bigoted, intolerant, or homophobic thought or a
hateful thought. Doesn't he sound like a homosexual? I think he does, not
that I am saying he is.
But then on another page, much further back in the book,
wanting to, I guess, look like the champion of Christianity and the Bible,
Haley says that the sodomite activists want to marginalize Christians, and
then he says that isn't even enough for them. "Christians are
vilified with labels like 'homophobic,' 'hate-monger,' and
'intolerant.'" What a minute. That's on page 167. Back on page
seventy one, he accused Christians of being hateful, bigoted, intolerant,
or being homophobic. There he uses the sodomites' words.
On page ninety one, Mike Haley quotes Joe Dallas, another
ex-homosexual who thinks there is such a thing as a sodomite Christian. He
thinks the same thing. The issue is a pastor who "reached out"
to sodomites—you know in that neo-evangelical, forget-about-the-law
way—instead of preaching the Word of God to them, which is true
love—love for the Lord, love for the Word of God, and then love for lost
souls. [Dallas] says this: "Soon,
gay people started showing up at his church—not necessarily to repent.
Sometimes in pairs. Just coming to hear what this man had to say who had
been so loving and gentle and open on the radio program. And the
congregation got nervous. They said, 'Pastor, the homosexuals are coming!
They are coming down the aisles by twos! What are we going to do?'"
In other words, there are all sorts of open, arrogant sodomites that are
not the least bit repentant; they're coming to see what's going on; and of
course the congregation got a little nervous. You know, they have children
there too. And how are we going to play this? What are we going to do?
What are you going to preach? What did the pastor say? "He said,
'Well, I guess they can take a seat next to the idolaters and the gossips
and the fornicators and the whoremongers. Make room.'"
Now again, what happened to the Word of God? We are supposed
to think it a wonderful thing that a pastor would have a church apparently
full of open, unrepentant sodomites along with open, unrepentant
idolaters, gossips, fornicators, and whoremongers. Well, the Word of God
says something much different about Christ's Body, the Church. For
instance, what happened to I Corinthians chapter five? But here we see the
very sin for which the proud antinomians among the Corinthian church were
condemned: "And ye are puffed up, and have not rather mourned, that
he that hath done this deed might be taken away from among you." And
"a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump." Christians are never
going to be perfect until they're in the presence of Christ. I mean
without sin. But we can't turn the church into a mob of open lawbreakers.
Now as Christians, we are to go out and preach the gospel to
the lost, but we are not to build churches out of still lost sinners! But
Mr. Haley, always sensitive to sodomite feelings, is against Christians
preaching the gospel to the lost, at least to the sodomites. That's the
way it sounds to me with regard to going out, preaching with power. He
writes on page ninety six: "Many well-meaning Christians, for
instance, attend gay-pride parades and similarly homosexuality-affirming
events, hoping to reach the lost for Christ. But such celebrations are
rarely favorable for evangelism. In fact, those attending usually react to
Christian outreach efforts with disgust. My suggestion"—"my
suggestion," Mike Haley says; "my suggestion" to you
Christians who have been standing against this spread of sodomy in our
land, standing against this perversion of the Word of God and God's
creation, going out with gospel banners and preaching the gospel,
reproving the unfruitful works of darkness, sharing the gospel with
sodomites—what is Mike Haley's suggestion to you? "Focus your
outreach efforts by investing in the life of a gay individual in a neutral
setting."
Has Mike Haley ever read of the preaching of the prophets and
the Apostles? Has he ever read the book of Acts? Hasn't he heard that the
gospel is foolishness to those who are perishing? Doesn't he know we are
to preach to the conscience of every man? This advice of Mike Haley's is
the siren song of the devil. I don't hesitate to say it. You know, he's
saying, Don't reprove the unfruitful works of darkness! Don't preach the
gospel to all creatures. Don't be a light to the world. Just make a friend
of a sodomite and invest in his life and have your good manners, as the
Scriptures say, corrupted.
By the way, on page 145 of his book, Mike Haley writes this
unbiblical statement regarding sin: "Homosexuality is neither the
greatest nor the least—it's just another sin that can keep anyone from
experiencing God's best." That's all homosexual acts are to Mike
Haley—just another sin that can keep a sodomite from experiencing God's
best. In other words, they can be saved, but it could be even better than
it is.
It is clear that Mr. Mike Haley does not tremble before the
Word of God as He calls us through the prophet Isaiah to do. God calls us
to tremble before His Word. As further proof, listen to this comment from
Mike Haley on Romans chapter 1, verse 28 which states of sodomites:
"And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God
gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not
convenient." Now here's what Mr. Haley says about that verse:
"Some
people believe these are four eternally damning words: 'God
gave them over.' Their eisegesis (reading one's own ideas into God's
Word) goes like this: 'If God gave them over, then they don't have the
capacity for redemption because God won't contradict Himself by changing
His mind and offering salvation.' . . .
"These
people miss two truths. The first nonnegotiable to any Christian's faith
is the truth of Christ's complete
work of salvation on the cross. And the second truth is that
homosexuality is just one of many sins listed in 1 Corinthians
6:9-10."
Now that's what Mr. Haley says about Romans chapter 1, verse
28. Well, first of all, no one has the "capacity for
redemption"; Christ is the redeemer of those dead in their trespasses
and sins.
But here, as throughout his book, it is Mr. Haley who is the
one guilty of reading his own ideas—and I would say his own emotions and
his own past—into God's Word. Romans chapter one, verse 28 speaks
plainly on its own. The sodomites being spoken of, it says, have been
given over to a reprobate mind. Now we know from I Corinthians chapter
six, verses nine through eleven that some sodomites have been saved by the
power of God. It's very few because it's very few of all sinners who are
saved; and with this destructive, heart-hardening, conscience-searing
behavior of homosexuality, we can be sure there are very few saved. And
here is a stark warning that homosexuality is a dangerous sin that so
corrupts the one involved in it that he is soon given over—or she—to a
reprobate mind.
But let's quickly add a bit more context for Mr. Haley's
sake and for those he is deceiving. Verse 18 of the same chapter of Romans
says the individuals given over to a reprobate mind suffer "the wrath
of God." Verse 21 says, "[T]heir foolish heart was
darkened." Verse 24 states God "gave them up to
uncleanness." Verse 26 states, "God gave them up unto vile
affections." Verse 27 tells us they receive "in themselves that
recompense of their error which was meet." Verse 28 says, "God
gave them over to a reprobate mind." Verse 32 says, "Who knowing
the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of
death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them."
That's a little context for what Mr. Haley is saying about Romans chapter
one, verse twenty-eight.
Now Mr. Mike Haley ought to stop misleading the Lord's
people. He ought to turn to the Scriptures as the lamp unto his feet and
cease assisting the kingdom of darkness with his neo-evangelical,
emotion-driven teachings on homosexuality; and people ought to stop
listening to the Mike Haleys of this world; and people like D. James
Kennedy and other Christian celebrities ought to stop promoting his books
and his perverted gospel on Christian radio at the expense—literally
financial expense and also spiritual expense—of the Body of Christ. If
Mike Haley has been redeemed by the Lord, we would expect that he would
repent of all his gross misrepresentation of God's Word. That is our
prayer for him.
Remember, we're not taking Mr. Haley to task here for any
minor things here. We're not talking about something where it's just a
slip of the tongue, or he didn't express himself the best or made some
small error without realizing it. In the short time I've talked about this
issue, and with as much as we commented on, I could have made some
mistakes. I hope you'll bring them to my attention if I have. We're not
talking about that sort of thing. We're talking about a systematic error
here. We're talking about anti-biblical, unbiblical doctrine—things that
fly against the Word of God. And so this is very, very important. This is
systematic, this is pervasive throughout his book and his ministry; and we
need to be aware of this. The Word of God is more important than
personalities. This isn't about gnat-straining. This is all about a
systematic weakening of the Word of God—or at least an attempt to—a
systematic assault upon the authority of the Bible. And so it is very
important that the Body of Christ understand this and the Body of Christ
take appropriate action where they can to stand up against this sort of
deception, this sort of attack upon the very Word of God.
Back
to top. |